Uganda to review Agriculture Extension Services
By EPRC
Uganda government has setup a committee to begin reviewing agriculture extension services to reach farmers better after identifying various contradictions in the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program set up in 2001.
Uganda government has setup a committee to begin reviewing agriculture extension services to reach farmers better after identifying various contradictions in the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program set up in 2001.
The committee has began
work and is expected to come up with a better model, according the Minister for
Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Hon Tress Bucyanayandi.
“We
are embarking on institutional reforms. NAADS was a project supposed to
transform agriculture and help us. I think some of the decisions taken at that
time may have been correct but they have been tested and are not working today,”
the Minister said during the Agriculture and Food
Security Forum on the theme, “Unlocking the export potential of Uganda’s
agriculture sector,” held on June 6, 2013 at Hotel Africana in Kampala, Uganda.
It is expected that reforms
may include privatization of funding, delivery of extension services, and
decentralization of authority to lower levels of government, including delegation
to NGOs and farmer organizations.
Agricultural extension
has been hotly debated since the implementation of NAADS program in 2001.
Conceived as a demand-driven approach and largely publicly funded with services
provided by the private sector, the NAADS program targets the development and
use of farmer institutions.
Hon Bucyanayandi
outlined several contradictions in extension services including the hire and
fire concept and parallel extension services, which created an unhealthy competition.
For instance, NAADS was
founded on the principle that small farmers would demand for extension services,
which was grossly an oversight. “To expect a small farmer to look for an
extension worker for those services was expecting too much,” the Minister said.
Another concept that was
being tried but didn’t seem to work was the ‘hire and fire.’ Under the concept an
extension worker was hired for a short time—two years—that did not work out.
“ In extension, you
need some kind of rapport. You need that kind of relationship between an
extension worker and the farmer. So, two years isn’t enough,” Hon Bucyanayandi
said.
The third element that
was also tried and appeared not to function as well was the expectation that a small
farmer would contribute towards hiring of the extension worker.
And that even local
government would supplement.
Again that practice, did not work because the small
farmers didn’t have the money. Parallel extension services also created an
unhealthy competition.
Comments
Post a Comment